Appeals
An appeal is a request for some kind of relief from a higher court, such as the United States Court of Appeals or the United States Supreme Court. There are many types of appeals in criminal cases. Such appeals can include challenges to pretrial motions, claims that a trial was unfair, arguments that insufficient evidence shows the defendant's guilt, or challenges to the sentence imposed by a judge. Furthermore, most jurisdictions have complicated "post-conviction" or habeas corpus proceedings, which take place after the first round of appeals is over.
A good appellate lawyer must be extremely well versed in the law itself. But just knowing the law will not help if the lawyer cannot get his or her ideas across to the judges who are reviewing a case. Clients need an appellate lawyer who writes clearly and who can withstand the rigors of questioning at oral argument. The attorneys at Kish & Lietz began their careers as law clerks for prominent federal judges, jobs that hone the research and writing skills of students who often graduate at the top of their law school classes. We continue to pride ourselves on our creative and clear writing. We constantly challenge our opponents on appeal by forcefully arguing our client's position.
The appellate process can be extremely complex in both federal and state court. Paul Kish and Carl Lietz have handled hundreds of appeals and have obtained significant relief for many clients. Our experience will guide you or your family member through the process of appealing his or her criminal case. Feel free to call us today at (404) 588-3991, or contact us online to schedule an appointment for a consultation.
Georgia Federal Criminal Lawyer Blog - Appeals
- U.S. v. Irey: Divided En Banc Eleventh Circuit Holds Criminal Child Pornography Sentence Substantively Unreasonable And Remands for Sentencing at Statutory Maximum Last week, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, sitting en banc, decided United States v. Irey. The 142-page majority opinion recounted gruesome sex ....
- Gilbert: Eleventh Circuit Corrects “Complete Miscarriage of Justice” in Federal Criminal Sentencing Under Career Offender Enhancement This Monday, the Eleventh Circuit held in Gilbert v. United States that, for federal sentencing purposes, the act of being a U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1 ....
- Holland: Supreme Court Reverses Eleventh Circuit, Holding That Its Standard for Equitable Tolling of the Federal Habeas Corpus Statute’s Timeliness Provision is Too Rigid Last Monday, the Supreme Court of the United States reversed the Eleventh Circuit’s decision in Holland v. Florida. The Court held, as have all ....